Harris sees
academic writing as the chance to interact with other intellectual writers and
to rewrite their work. He comments on how people get caught up in the legality
of using other sources, which I think is true. Students often dwell on that
part of using other literary works, and it is highly important, but it is not
the only thing that needs to be focused on when using other sources. An
interesting point was that intellectuals’ ideas and creativity are rooted in
the people and things around them. That stood out because there is so much
attainable information in the world right now, it is difficult to come up with
original ideas sometimes. Harris looks at writing as a social activity, and how
writing is about interacting with texts. He sees writing as a “move” and how
writers move in response to others. Both Harris and Sullivan have a lot to say
about the relationship between different writers and ideas. They both emphasize
how writing is about using the information of others, but using it in a way
that makes it your own writing. Blogging incorporates Harris’ idea of writing
as a “move,” because bloggers are constantly moving in response to things that
happen to them or things that they hear about or see happen. Harris and
Sullivan both think highly of the importance of utilizing the information
around and incorporating it into your writing in a way to get the most out of
it, analyzing it and critiquing it, but not getting too one sided about it.
Harris and Sullivan have many similar ideas on writing overall.
I think that your connection seen between Harris and Sullivan is the heart of this post. "writing is about using the information of others, but using using it in a way that makes it your own writing". This connection was stated by both writers in their own way, and I would agree that it can be seen in both forms of writing and blogging.
ReplyDelete